Comments on: 3 construction labor policy changes you should know about /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/ Building and Construction News in Portland, Oregon and the Pacific Northwest Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:36:14 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.6 By: Here in Eugene /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-36562 Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:36:14 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-36562 This is exactly what happens when Unions receive dues, they go buy a politician or two. Does the public know that companies (by law) can’t speak against a union? What kind of crap is that? That’s like saying you can’t say Jesus. How did that law get passed? Oh, yes yes, it was without a public vote.

HEY FOLKS GET A BRAIN FIND OUT WHO THOSE POLITICIANS ARE AND DON’T VOTE FOR THEM.

LAZY OREGONIANS THIS IS WHAT YOU GET

]]>
By: Tea Party /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-36405 Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:27:36 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-36405 Associated General Contractors claims to be an advocate for the construction industry.

However, they are comphensated highest by contractors which pay more for membership. The more annual gross income the higher the annual membership costs.

Those membership costs pay for lobbying the government.

Those lobbying efforts pay to put small general contractors OUT OF BUSINESS. How? – simple by assisting re-writing contracting laws so that their highest paid contractors are awarded the biggest and most profitable projects.

Oregon University System is a great example. In 2003 OUS gained controll of all public contracts and have been exempt from the bidding process. NO-BID contracts have been handed out ever since to the same contractors year after year.

OHSU is another great example.

Look at the Oregon Public Contracting Coalition documents and find all of the crooks names that are ripping the competing businesses off.

Robbed the competitors and because there was no VOTE by the general public necessary they just did what they wanted.

You people are crooks.

]]>
By: NO MORE UNEMPLOYMENT SCHEMES /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-36402 Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:06:05 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-36402 Our local contractors need employment contracts. Our local government and congress is forcing us into further into unemployment by limiting “who” gets these contracts.

3 years ago 50% of Public Construction Contracts were NO-BID by diverting the contract awards from the ORS279c Public Contracting Code.

Today 90% are diverted and are NO-BID and special interest.

Have we forgotten that each business in construction has a diverse employee base already? Why do construction contracts require that the “Owner” is a minority?

Why does the federal government require that 100% of Federal contracts be handed to 11% of the contruction industry.

Politicians you are publicizing that you are creating MORE JOBS when you are actually creating MORE UNEMPLOYMENT and BANKRUPTCIES.

Stop the reverse discrimination NOW

]]>
By: Construction Projects Tax Payer Watch /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-36400 Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:01:10 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-36400 Since Unions represent only 11% of the labor market…

…and 89% of the remainder which is non-union decided to control government spending by not paying taxes at all what then?

the government needs the 89% to pay for the lion share of the costs and for all of those special interest contracts and NO-BID contracts.

Tax Payers pay attention to the bad politicians that sign your rights away.

Did I mention that those contracts above are ONLY for UNION COMPANIES and that out of the 155,000,000 million workers in america 137,950,000 are non-union which are paying for the costs of union only contracts and the 15% wage difference when they bid against a non-union company for labor?

Union contracts cost the tax payer at least 10% more on multi-million dollar contracts just for labor.

]]>
By: Laura A. /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-36394 Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:04:52 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-36394 Let’s not for get that all of our public construction is paid for with normal joe’s dough. Through his real estate taxes and business tax and commercial real estate tax.

Taxes increase to cover the cost of government spending. Joe cares whether he has to spend $10M for a building valued at $6M.

You can pay higher costs to union companies but it does not increase the value of the real estate.

It should be required that the general public should be able to vote on these issues as it is the general public paying for the contracts handed to unions and NO-BID construction contracts.

These agreements are forcing Non-Union companies out of business.

Unions are paying politicians to write, support and vote in favor of these Bills. SHAME SHAME SHAME.

No PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SHOULD BE AUTOMATICALLY HANDED TO ANY ENTITY WITHOUT COMPETITION BY ALL EXPERIENCED CONTRACTORS.

SHAME ON OUR POLITICIANS FOR EXCLUDING THE VOTING RIGHTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC (aka Blank Check)

]]>
By: IAN NASCIMENTO /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-34144 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:29:48 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-34144 LOOKS LIKE A REAL GOOD REASON FOR A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FEDS.

]]>
By: 3 construction labor policy changes you should know about – Daily Journal of Commerce | AEC Media /news/2010/07/26/3-construction-labor-policy-changes-you-should-know-about/#comment-33908 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:02:32 +0000 /?p=56893#comment-33908 […] Visit link: 3 construction labor policy changes you should know about – Daily Journal of Commerce […]

]]>