Comments on: What exactly is ‘blight?’ Oregon needs a new definition /news/2011/04/25/what-exactly-is-blight-oregon-needs-a-new-definition-2/ Building and Construction News in Portland, Oregon and the Pacific Northwest Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:42:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.6 By: Phil P /news/2011/04/25/what-exactly-is-blight-oregon-needs-a-new-definition-2/#comment-99730 Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:55:56 +0000 /?p=71048#comment-99730 We need to change the language in the statutes. My understanding is that the word “blight” was used when urban renewal came into being in the 50s and 60s because sites or neighborhoods were truly “blighted”–run down, vacant, etc.

Now, we have a right to use this tool for a wider range of purposes. Essentially, we are trying to revitalize or improve areas that are falling short of their potential, and have significance to the entire community. While I would not argue that most Downtown Portland is blighted, I would argue that it is worth concentrating capital dollars there to continue to revitalize and improve it, and in turn, incentivize more private development that creates property tax dollars. So we need a wider range of words than just blight!

]]>