Comments on: Interior design bill sparks professional controversy /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/ Building and Construction News in Portland, Oregon and the Pacific Northwest Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:23:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.6 By: Alex Robert /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-956458 Wed, 09 Jan 2019 11:23:02 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-956458 A great post containing a lot of information, actually I’m an undergraduate and looking for this kind of knowledge. This helped me alot 🙂

]]>
By: State Street Solutions » Interior design bill sparks professional controversy /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-70703 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 03:32:24 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-70703 […] Lindsey O’Brien 91ÊÓÆµ – Daily Journal of Commerce Thursday, January 26, […]

]]>
By: Divisive Oregon interior design bill dies in committee | Daily Journal of Commerce /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69091 Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:48:18 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69091 […] bill, held several events in hopes that it would rally enough support to pass the legislation that would require interior designers to obtain a license in order to work in commercial […]

]]>
By: kauna26 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69064 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:30:44 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69064 NativePDX & JK –
This bill does not kill competition, rather it provides a path for commercial interior designers to pursue projects they’re currenlty not able to (but qualified for) thereby increasing competition for those jobs.

I encourage you to educate yourself on what the bill actually does because it sounds like your reiterating issues of the past. This years bill and future bills have extensive exemptions that do not restrict all forms of interior design. Nor does it restrict the title interior designer or interior design.

]]>
By: Alicia Snyder-Carlson /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69063 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 22:20:00 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-69063 IDC-Oregon Learns From Commercial Interior Design Bill Hearing

Interior Design Collaborative-Oregon and supporters testified Monday February 13th in front of the Senate Small Business, Government, and Consumer Affairs Committee in support of Senate Bill 1521 to license commercial interior designers. Supporters included the IDC-Oregon President, FFA Principal and architect Troy Ainsworth, independent commercial interior designers, and a residential design build professional. Although the bill died in committee, supporters say they learned new information to craft a better bill for the next session.

Senator Chip Shields, Chair of the Senate Small Business, Government, and Consumer Affairs Committee said, “I was pleased to give the interior designers a first hearing at their Legislature. The legislative process is often a marathon, not a sprint. I encourage your membership to get involved in the elections of 2012.â€

This was IDC-Oregon’s second proposal to the Legislature and first bill hearing. Former public relations chair, Sermin Yesilada, acknowledges the amount of work still to come, “This was a great step forward. However, we need to reach out more to residential designers and kitchen and bath designers. People did not seem to understand that there were exemptions for them such as residential design, and condo/townhome units. Nor did they seem to be aware of the grandfathering provisions. There is still a lot of confusion about the bill.â€

IDC-Oregon will take time during the interim to meet with opposition groups to listen to concerns regarding the exemption and practice language.

President Alicia Snyder-Carlson is upbeat about the effort’s future, “Although we did not get the ultimate outcome, I feel the hearing was a success. Opposition and competition is good for all of us no matter what you’re fighting for because it keeps you honest. It’s one of IDC-Oregon’s goals to collaborate with the entire design community and I’m confident the insights we gained this year will create a better bill that will protect Oregon consumers and build business opportunities.â€

]]>
By: NativePDX /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68965 Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:55:25 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68965 The only reason for this bill is to kill competition . This is a old story that has been replayed many time, in many different industries.

Kill competition through government regulation and laws!

The consumers lose again because Interior Design Collaborative selfishly design laws to protect themselves from what they precise as unwanted competition.

]]>
By: Danielle /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68947 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:01:30 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68947 I have a simple question for those interior designers who are opposing this legislation- Why would someone who considers themselves a professional put so much effort into avoiding an exam on a subject that you are passionate about and actually work in every day? I have taken the NCIDQ exam (and passed!) and actually enjoyed studying for it! Interior Design is my passion and taking the exam only solidified that fact for me.
Thanks to the Interior Design Collaborative for doing this important work- for all of us!

]]>
By: nancy hiss /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68926 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:09:10 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68926 The Interior Design Collaborative has done an excellent job of updating proposed interior design licensing legislation. The current proposal balances the business interests of architects and residential designers while maintaining the ultimate goal of protecting public safety and welfare.

To question this legislation is to question licensing for any and all design professions – architects, landscape architects, contractors, and engineers.

]]>
By: jim karlock /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68918 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:57:57 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68918 Linda—-This regulation will benefit the health, safety and welfare of the public.
JK———And even MORE IMPORTANT — IT WILL REDUCE COMPETITION and let YOU RAISE RATES.

Thanks
JK

]]>
By: Linda Myers /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68916 Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:55:31 +0000 /news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/#comment-68916 As an interior designer who has practiced for over 30 years, I support IDC’s efforts.
This regulation will benefit the health, safety and welfare of the public. In the course of our work, interior designers are responsible for:
• Fire / life safety and the knowledge of applicable building codes
• ADA compliance and meeting the needs of a diverse population
• Sustainable design, energy efficiency and environmental impact of built spaces
• Occupant health, productivity and ergonomics

The ability to provide these services is gained and demonstrated through education, professional experience, and examination. Licensing will ensure accountability and consumer protection.
Legal recognition of Interior Design is currently in force in 28 states and most Canadian provinces, and pending in 9 additional states. In order to be competitive, Oregon should be in alignment with our neighbors.

]]>