A wetlands system project that saved the city of Prineville tens of millions of dollars took top honors Wednesday night at the 2018 Engineering Excellence Awards event hosted by the American Council of Engineering Companies of Oregon.

In winning the Project of the Year title, the Crooked River Wetlands project, submitted by Anderson Perry & Associates and the city of Prineville, also claimed the right to advance to the ACEC Engineering Excellence national awards competition.

Judges for the local competition gave the wetlands project high marks for providing both an affordable solution that protects the environment and the community with valuable lessons in conservation and stewardship.

The project was the result of a population boom in Prineville that severely taxed the city’s existing wastewater treatment system. Rather than invest $62 million in construction of a traditional mechanical facility, the city approached Anderson Perry & Associates to identify alternatives. The firm’s team designed a series of wetland cells that treat wastewater before releasing it back into the environment. The wetlands area, which ended up costing approximately $8 million, includes walking paths and pavilions as well as informational kiosks created by local schoolchildren.

Parametrix scored two wins during the Wednesday evening event. The company earned the award for Best Small Project for its work on the Deschutes River Trail Boardwalk, a collaborative project with Oregon Parks and Recreation Department staff. The company also stepped forward with Kittelson & Associates to claim a Best in Category award for their respective work on the U.S. 20 Barclay Roundabout for the Oregon Department of Transportation.

KPFF and GRI scored a Best in Category award for their combined work on the Cultural Crossing, an expansion project at the Portland Japanese Garden.

Five firms received Grand awards for work on four projects. Nishkian Dean received one for its work on the commercial crew tower capability project at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. PAE‘s Grand award resulted from its work on the Oregon Zoo Education Center. Shannon & Wilson and HBH Consulting Engineers teamed up for their award-winning Southern Flow Corridor project for the Port of Tillamook Bay and Tillamook County. OBEC Consulting Engineers received its Grand award for work on the Peter Courtney Minto Island Bridge for the city of Salem.

Sixteen other projects received Honor awards.

The awards were selected by a jury of building industry professionals that included Mark Kennedy, associate dean and professor of civil engineering in the Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland; Tova Peltz, region 1 geo-environmental unit manager for the Oregon Department of Transportation; Nick Bjork, publisher of the Daily Journal of Commerce; Mark Hanson, chief of the structural and architectural design section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Portland District; and Ermel Quevedo, a past president of ACEC Oregon.

The post ACEC Oregon honors top engineering projects appeared first on Daily Journal of Commerce.

A tunnel under the Willamette River is still an option on the table for replacing the aging and vulnerable Burnside Bridge.

The alternative was discussed last week at a coffee-and-pizza stakeholders meeting facilitated by the agency in charge of the 91-year-old span, Multnomah County.

Officials are considering how to shore up the 17-mile “Burnside Corridor” – Burnside Street from U.S. Route 26 to Gresham – as a “lifeline” through the Portland-metro area, with the bridge over the Willamette River an acknowledged weak link.

A tunnel, however, is considered a highly unlikely solution, for reasons including high energy consumption and lack of space for terminals. What’s looking more and more likely is that all or parts of the Burnside Bridge will need to be replaced to provide a regional lifeline in the case of a major seismic event.

Other options that fared poorly in the assessment by the county’s consultants include preserving the Burnside Bridge, performing a full retrofit, and bolstering a different bridge, such as the Morrison. Though these alternatives scored low, planners cautioned nothing has been decided yet.

The county’s project manager, Megan Neill, said the “universe of options” for a Burnside Bridge upgrade is expected to be reduced enough by next fall for a recommendation to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. After approval, around a decade could pass before project completion.

The meeting of stakeholders was the second of four. Interested parties have included the Old Town Chinatown Community Association, the Central Eastside Industrial Council, the Portland Saturday Market and Burnside Skatepark users. Wide-ranging discussions at this meeting and previous ones have covered how Portland will respond to a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake – specifically, how it will clear debris and kick-start commerce.

The project is one of several efforts by governments in the region to prepare for fallout of a major quake. Metro is drafting a debris management plan, and the Portland Bureau of Transportation is preparing a plan for transportation recovery and a plan for upgrading unreinforced masonry buildings.

Dan Yates, director of the Portland Spirit, said his business signed an agreement with the city years ago to provide ferry service across the Willamette River in case of a major disaster.

He and others mused at the meeting about how Portlanders would respond when tested by disaster.

“I bet this city surprises itself,” he said. “People will do remarkable things after a big event.”

None of inner Portland’s bridges are expected to fare well in a major earthquake. Even TriMet‘s young Tilikum Crossing is compromised by highly liquefiable soil beneath its approaches. The county’s two most recent large bridge replacements, the Sauvie Island Bridge ($48 million) and the Sellwood Bridge ($215 million), both meet current seismic code, but the crossings aren’t considered good seismic lifelines due to their locations and other factors.

“It’s really a call to action,” Neill said. “People wonder why we’re focusing on a bridge in Portland, but we feel it’s important to the entire region to restore service to the Burnside.”

Like the Tilikum Crossing, the soils under the Burnside Bridge are highly liquefiable and expected at the east approach to move toward the river more than 20 feet. This will have to be addressed in whichever plan is adopted.

One space likely to be significantly affected is the Burnside Skatepark, which was constructed off-the-books in the 1990s among the bridge abutments on the bridge’s east side.

“It feels to me that there are going to be some kind of impacts to the skate park no matter what alternative we talk about,” said Jeff Heilman of consultancy Parametrix. “There are certainly needs in those existing columns.”

The skate park’s designated representative was not in attendance Thursday.

Stakeholders at the meeting acknowledged another major challenge: informing constituents. The county recently scored a win in this regard. It paid $135,000 to engineering firm HDR to create a realistic video rendering of the bridge during an earthquake. It’s so far gotten more than 50,000 views.

(Editor’s note: This story has been modified from an original version to reflect the correct price for a video rendering of the Burnside Bridge during an earthquake.)

The post Burnside Bridge upgrade options pared down appeared first on Daily Journal of Commerce.