91视频

Subcontractors take late payment issue to Oregon Legislature

By: Nick Bjork//April 5, 2011//

Subcontractors take late payment issue to Oregon Legislature

Nick Bjork//April 5, 2011//

Listen to this article

Sen. Chip Shields, D-Portland, is promoting , which would require general contractors to pay subcontractors in a timely fashion and prevent repeat offenders from working on future public projects.

Shields

鈥淚s it much to ask in this great state of ours for people to pay their bills on time?鈥 Shields said earlier this week during a hearing in front of the Senate general government, consumer and small business protection committee. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 believe it is.鈥

Over the past few years, subcontractors have noticed that a small number of general contractors have been using a loophole to defer payments.

Basically, subcontractors are paid for every 30 days of work between 30 to 60 days after completion. During this time, a general contractor sometimes changes its process for submitting pay paperwork without telling the subcontractor. Once that payment period has elapsed, the general contractor can withhold payment because paperwork wasn鈥檛 submitted correctly.

Under state law, general contractors then gain an extra 120 days to pay. Some of these delays result in lawsuits in which the general contractor argues that it doesn鈥檛 owe any money at all.

鈥淭he large majority of (general contractors) would never do this, but there are a few bad apples out there, and with cash flow as vital as it is to our industry, it only takes one instance to hurt a company,鈥 said Maurice Rahming, president of Portland-based subcontractor O鈥橬eill Electric.

Rahming added that banks and bonding agents consider the avoided payments as unreceivables, which hurts not only a company鈥檚 cash flow, but also its business relationships.

Even people who testified against SB 890 at the hearing acknowledged that general contractors should be required to make payments in a timely manner. But John Rakowitz, a spokesman for the Associated General Contractors鈥 Oregon-Columbia chapter, said the issue should not be handled at the legislative level.

Rakowitz

鈥淭his puts state agencies in the business of policing the relationship between (general contractors) and (subcontractors),鈥 he said. 鈥淎nd given the legal and technical portions of this bill 鈥 we just don鈥檛 believe it鈥檚 been vetted out with the (perspectives) of the entire industry.鈥

Rakowitz also noted that certain types of firms profit in boom times, while others perform better when business is lean. The AGC doesn鈥檛 like to support legislation being pitched in reaction to economic conditions, he said.

鈥淚t seems like we could solve this within the industry,鈥 he said.

But Shields disagreed.

鈥淭his bill has nothing to do with advantages to specific firms; it鈥檚 simply about the fair use of public dollars,鈥 he said.

The bill would require a general contractor to pay a subcontractor within 30 days after it submitted a request for payment. If a general contractor wanted to change the contract, or the process of submitting paperwork, it would be required to give the subcontractor 45 days notice.

A general contractor鈥檚 first violation of the rule would result in a warning, which would be expunged from the record if the firm were to avoid another violation in the next five years. A second violation would result in the contractor being removed from the state鈥檚 preferred contractor list. A third violation would result in a one-year disbarment from work on public projects.

Rakowitz said a number of questions would need to be answered before his organization would support a bill. He wants to know if the bill would take into account instances when general contractors aren鈥檛 paid, or expected price changes when general contractors provide their own materials.

Shields, meanwhile, is continuing to push the legislation.

鈥淲e鈥檝e got some work to do on this; there is no doubt about that,鈥 he said. 鈥淏ut I believe in this and think it鈥檚 exactly what this committee should be doing. I want to move it to session within the next few weeks.鈥

An earlier version of this story erroneously reported that Columbia Wire & Iron Works went out of business in part because of delays in general contractor payment. Columbia Wire & Iron Works is still operating and currently has a staff of about 35.



News

See All News

Commentary

See All Commentary

COMMUNITY CALENDAR