91视频

State planning process too slow for one wave energy firm

By: Lindsey O'Brien//November 30, 2011//

State planning process too slow for one wave energy firm

Lindsey O'Brien//November 30, 2011//

Listen to this article

Oregon has drawn a great deal of interest from burgeoning companies, but for at least one, the development of sea-ready technology outpaced the state’s planning process.

Aquamarine Power, a Scottish wave energy company, closed its one-person Newport office last month, citing the intensive, ongoing planning process that Oregon undertook in 2008. But that process may ultimately lead to more wave energy investment in the future, according to others in the industry.

鈥淲e’re taking major question marks off the table,鈥 said Onno Husing, executive director of the Oregon Coastal Zone Management Association 鈥 a nonprofit that serves local elected officials on the . 鈥淢any of us firmly believe 鈥 and many companies have communicated to us 鈥 that the plan will substantially enhance the investment climate.鈥

After a number of wave energy companies in 2007 submitted permit applications to develop facilities within fishing areas off the Oregon coast, then-Gov. Ted Kulongoski directed the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development to amend the state’s Territorial Sea Plan to include provisions for wave energy siting.

鈥淭he process is just lagging behind the desire to create this economic activity in Oregon,鈥 said Aquamarine Power CEO Martin McAdam, whose company has networked in Oregon for several years. 鈥淣ow we’re exploring a number of sites in Washington and California, and when Oregon is ready, we hope to come back.鈥

The groups charged with drawing up Oregon’s new plan 鈥 the Territorial Sea Plan Working Group and the Ocean Policy Advisory Council 鈥 on Dec. 15 and 16 will discuss draft maps that will determine where wave energy buoys may, and may not, be sited.

But Aquamarine Power, one of the few companies with proven, utility-scale, hydrokinetic technology, doesn’t want to maintain operations in Oregon until the state plan is final.

鈥淚t’s costing us time and money to be working in Oregon,鈥 McAdam said. 鈥淲e’re quite a small company, although with a big ambition for Oregon. The fact is we need to see not just a willingness on behalf of the state, but actually the proper mechanisms in place to allow people to secure part of the seabed for the development of wave power.鈥

The marine maps, which incorporate more than 100 data overlays and more than 1,000 square miles of the ocean, chart the existing locations of fisheries, recreational areas, wildlife refuges and other areas, and will designate places for ocean energy development.

After conducting more work sessions along the coast and collecting public comments in early 2012, OPAC will submit a plan by spring 2012, according to Paul Klarin, marine affairs coordinator at the DLCD.

鈥淓verything is coming together,鈥 he said.

But the planning process has been complicated, in part because of the variety of proposed technologies, each with its own 鈥渟weet spot鈥 in terms of siting needs.

鈥淎re there some people confused by how this will all come together in the wave energy industry? Oh yes, and I feel their pain,鈥 Husing said. 鈥淏ut the planning process has only inconvenienced one company (Aquamarine Power). That’s the larger context for this story.鈥

Unlike many other hydrokinetic technologies, which optimize in deep water, Aquamarine Power’s 鈥淥yster鈥 technology is installed near the shore in water approximately 10 to 20 yards deep. The Oyster, which has been successfully deployed off the coast of Scotland but nowhere in the U.S., is a wave-powered pump that drives ocean water to an onshore hydroelectric turbine.

鈥淚f any device needs planning, it’s theirs,鈥 Husing said.

The Oyster’s proximity to the shoreline has raised concerns from coastal citizens about obstructed viewsheds, according to Husing, and additional permitting would be required for the technology’s onshore components.

The only company to win Oregon’s approval so far is Ocean Power Technologies, which leased space off the coast of Reedsport before the state began its official planning process. Ten of the firm’s PowerBuoys are permitted for installation 2.5 miles offshore near Reedsport, although none has been deployed yet.

Even though Aquamarine Power will not maintain an Oregon office, McAdam said he will stay in contact with potential future partners such as Oregon Iron Works, American Bridge Co., Central Lincoln People’s Utility District and other utilities.

鈥淲e want to have a whole ecosystem for this new industry, and the U.S. is a very entrepreneurial and business friendly economy,鈥 McAdam said. 鈥淥nce the (planning process) rights itself, we’ll be back.鈥



News

See All News

Commentary

See All Commentary

COMMUNITY CALENDAR