91Ƶ

Downtown tower project on verge of approval

By: Chuck Slothower//November 2, 2018//

Downtown tower project on verge of approval

Chuck Slothower//November 2, 2018//

Listen to this article
As proposed, the Block 216 tower's concrete pilaster and glass elements would come together at Southwest 10th Avenue and Washington Street. A bar is planned inside the corner entrance. (GBD Architects)
As proposed, the tower’s concrete pilaster and glass elements would come together at Southwest 10th Avenue and Washington Street. A bar is planned inside the corner entrance. ()

The 35-story Block 216 proposal appeared to move closer to approval after a meeting Thursday.

Members of the said progress had been made on the mixed-use project’s design coherency and response to the context of the midtown blocks. The changes could lay the groundwork for approval to come at a design review hearing in December.

The design from GBD Architects and developer Walter Bowen’s has received some criticism from commissioners since a design advice hearing in June. Commissioners pointed to coherency issues between the soaring glass tower and a podium featuring a façade of white concrete pilaster.

“For the most part, the big idea that’s guiding the building seems pretty solid,” Commissioner Julie Livingston said. “However, there is a lack of resolution, and there has been from the beginning … lack of integration of the podium and the base.”

The tower, if built, would be one of the signature Portland buildings of its era based on its size alone. Plans call for more than 1 million square feet of building space, with approximately 250,000 square feet of luxury condos, 177,000 square feet of hotel space, 167,000 square feet of office space and 10,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space. The building would also have four and a half floors of underground parking.

A high-end hotelier is on board, GBD Director Phil Beyl said previously.

The building would occupy the block bounded by Southwest Ninth and 10th avenues and Washington and Alder streets, displacing more than 50 food carts and surface parking.

Staff recommended denial Thursday, saying the project did not meet guidelines. That’s a common step while teams work through design issues.

Design commissioners said the applicants had done enough to overcome their objections on a range of issues.

“I’m not going to kill the project because of the color of the pilaster,” Commissioner Zari Santner said.

Santner, the newest design commissioner, had expressed concern that the contrast between the white concrete decorative material on the podium and the darker glass tower was simply too stark.

“My hope is the contrast is not as stark as it appears in the rendering and the modeling,” she said.

An eco-roof would cover the podium but not the tower of the Block 216 mixed-use building. A corner swimming pool at the 19th floor would be set apart visually with different glass. (GBD Architects)
An eco-roof would cover the podium but not the tower of the Block 216 mixed-use building. A corner swimming pool at the 19th floor would be set apart visually with different glass. (GBD Architects)

The applicants are seeking an exception to a rule that requires a 12-foot setback along 75 percent of the property line facing the Green Loop. Block 216 is the first project involving the Green Loop – a city concept for a linear park throughout the Central City that would be friendly to bicycles and pedestrians.

Commissioner Jessica Molinar said she remained concerned about setting a precedent by approving a modification for the first Green Loop project. The applicants have contended that a proposed food hall facing the Green Loop meets the intent of the guidelines.

The applicants are also seeking a 30-foot-wide parking entrance along Washington Street and a 30-foot-wide loading zone on Alder Street. Livingston said that presents a challenge to public realm guidelines that seek to safeguard pedestrians.

“That is a lot of real estate given up to trucks and automobiles,” she said.

Commissioner Samuel Rodriguez argued the building needs those vehicle access points to function.

“We’re going to have buildings of these densities that are going to require these services,” he said.

Commissioners also appeared to be leaning toward granting an exception to rules that require roofs to be 100 percent eco-roofs. About 30 percent of the proposal is covered by eco-roof elements that would filter stormwater atop the podium. Architects and some commissioners said the city’s eco-roof guidelines are simply unworkable at the tower’s height of 460 feet. Winds at that height can dry out soils and move material, they said.

“Frankly, I think there needs to be a little bit of a revision (of design guidelines) for eco-roofs on high-rises,” Rodriguez said.

Commissioner Don Vallaster agreed.

“Flying trees are bad,” he said.

The project is scheduled to return before the Design Commission on Dec. 13.

(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)
(GBD Architects)


News

See All News

Commentary

See All Commentary

COMMUNITY CALENDAR