Three days a week, I tie my shoes, throw on an oversize backpack with a change of clothes, and start my run to work. It is a meditative process that is utterly exhausting. Candidly, the only reason I am able to commute this way is the firm鈥檚 shift toward a hybrid-work model.
The reality is I am not alone. For more than two years, countless employees have worked remotely from the comfort of their homes and have not stepped foot into an office. Although some people debate the benefits of remote work, there is little doubt that it is the future of employment for many industries. Businesses that do not offer remote work (or some hybrid version of it) face the possibility that employees will leave for one that does.
Here are six steps that employers can take to mitigate some of the risks associated with remote work. Given that long legal lists are sometimes hard to remember, I have used a running comparison to hopefully make the steps more memorable.
Grab running shoes (decide which jobs can be remote): Determine which positions will be allowed to be fully remote in another state. If employees will be required to visit an office location from time to time, who is going to pay for that travel? Under the law, a business may have to.
Decide on a route (approve remote locations): Decide where the business is going to hire or allow current employees to work remotely. For instance, a business may not want to hire an employee in a different time zone. Some states and cities are more difficult for employers than others (for example, after a Montana employee鈥檚 probationary period ends, the person cannot be terminated except for 鈥渃ause鈥). Consider whether the burden of compliance in a certain city or state is outweighed by the value the employee would bring to the business. And don鈥檛 forget about non-U.S. locations. Many employers are getting requests from employees seeking to work remotely in other countries. Laws in other countries are often far different than ours 鈥 sometimes in very surprising ways.
Stay on the sidewalk (conduct a legal job search):Ensure compliance in hiring practices. Many states and cities have protected characteristics in addition to those under federal law. Many also have 鈥渂an-the-box鈥 laws prohibiting employers from asking applicants about criminal history as well as salary history. Some states and cities even require employers to post salary ranges for positions in job advertisements. With that said, a business should decide whether it will pay a remote employee who currently resides in NYC the same as if the person worked remotely like rural Wyoming, where the cost of living is much less.
Avoid dangerous areas (hire properly):Confirm the business is following all state or local wage and hour laws. Keep in mind that minimum wage and overtime rules for nonexempt employees as well as salary thresholds for exempt employees differ throughout the country. Ensure that arbitration or restrictive covenant agreements are compliant in the remote jurisdiction. And check to see if there are any laws on reimbursement of employee expenses, especially given employees will be using their own internet, electricity, etc.
Obey traffic laws (comply with local tax and insurance rules):Work with accountants to set up taxes correctly. Some states have family leave and disability insurance programs that require employers to deduct from employee wages and/or contribute to a state-run fund. Make sure the business has enrolled in the state unemployment insurance programs and confirm that workers鈥 compensation insurance is compliant. Also investigate whether a business registration is required when at least one remote employee is working in a state.
Shower (provide employee notices and training):Distribute any required employment law postings to remote employees. Also review whether the state requires specific provisions be included in the employee handbook or other notices. It is highly recommended that employers draft and distribute state handbook addenda covering the pertinent state or local leave and other employment laws. Some states and cities also have mandatory anti-harassment training laws for employees.
While employment laws differ from state to state and even city to city, the common thread is that noncompliance can lead to costly and time-consuming lawsuits. While managing employees in new locations may present challenges for a business, sometimes offering remote work may be the competitive advantage needed in the current job market.
Stephen Scott is a partner in the Portland office of Fisher Phillips, a national firm dedicated to representing employers鈥 interests in all aspects of workplace law. Contact him at 503-205-8094 or [email protected].
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the preceding commentary are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the Daily Journal of Commerce or its editors. Neither the author nor the 91视频 guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein.
This website uses cookies, web beacons, pixels, tags, software development kits, and related tracking technologies, as described in our and , for purposes that may include website operation, analytics, analyzing site usage, enhancing site navigation optimizing a user's experience, and third-party advertising or marketing purposes. Through these technologies, we and certain third parties may automatically collect information about your interactions with our website, such as your browsing behavior and page views. We also may share this information about your activity on our website with our social media, advertising, analytics, and other business partners. By clicking 鈥淎ccept All鈥, you consent to the use of these technologies and that we can share information about your activity on our website with third parties in accordance with our and . If you do not agree with our use of non-essential tracking technologies, please click 鈥淩eject All.鈥 You may opt out of certain non-essential technologies by clicking 鈥淐ookie Settings.鈥
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Advertisement
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.