By: Bruce Garrett and Becky Zuschlag//April 27, 2023//
Bruce Garrett and Becky Zuschlag//April 27, 2023//

Navigating the aftermath of workplace injuries can be a challenging process. Multiple state and federal laws may apply, offering employees protections and imposing obligations on employers. Under Oregon law, injured workers are afforded a broad and complex array of protections. Specifically, injured workers are generally entitled to reinstatement and reemployment when they are ready to return to work following workers鈥 compensation leave. Injured workers are also protected against discrimination based on their invocation of the workers鈥 compensation system.
Reinstatement rights
A worker employed by an employer with 21 or more employees at the time of their on-the-job injury or at the time they make a demand to return to work are entitled to reinstatement rights under Oregon law. Employers are obligated to reinstate injured workers to their former position 鈥渦pon demand鈥 by the worker, assuming the person can perform the duties of their former position and the position still exists and is available. Beware that even if the worker鈥檚 former position was filled by another person while the worker was recovering from their injury, the position is considered 鈥渁vailable鈥 for purposes of the statute. Additionally, if the worker鈥檚 former position no longer exists, then the employer must offer the worker a vacant, suitable position.
The injured worker must make a timely demand for reinstatement to their former position according to the employer鈥檚 written policy. However, if the employer has no such policy, the worker鈥檚 demand may be:
The law provides that a certificate from the attending medical provider approving the worker鈥檚 return to work is evidence that the worker can perform the duties of their regular employment. If the medical provider鈥檚 release states that the employee is unable to perform the duties of their former position, but they are released to perform other duties, the employer then needs to consider the worker鈥檚 reemployment rights.
Reemployment rights
Employers with six or more employees are required to reemploy a worker who is disabled from performing the duties of their former position if the employer has an available and suitable position. Reemployment rights are triggered if the injured worker is medically released to perform the duties of an available, suitable position, and timely demand is made by the worker.
A 鈥渢imely demand鈥 for reemployment mirrors the requirements provided above with respect to a 鈥渢imely demand鈥 for reinstatement. Like the reinstatement statute, documentation from the worker鈥檚 medical provider stating that the worker can return to work but perform only 鈥渄escribed types of work鈥 is evidence of the worker鈥檚 ability to work.
A 鈥渟uitable position鈥 is one that meets the worker鈥檚 medical restrictions and for which the worker possesses the necessary skills and abilities. Additionally, a suitable position is 鈥渁s similar as is practicable to the worker鈥檚 former position鈥 in the terms and conditions of employment. If the worker, even after being reemployed in an available and suitable position, recovers to the point that they can perform the duties of their former position and they want to work in that position, the worker must make a timely demand for reinstatement.
Termination of rights
An injured worker鈥檚 reinstatement and reemployment rights do not last forever. Reinstatement and reemployment rights terminate when any one of the following events first occurs:
Other considerations
Employers should also be aware of the potential for injured workers claiming that they were discriminated against by the employer for invoking the workers鈥 compensation system. Even when an employee is not eligible for reinstatement or reemployment, employers should be cautious about terminating the employee because it could result in a claim for workers鈥 compensation discrimination. Prior to taking any action against or involving an injured worker who has invoked the workers鈥 compensation system, the employer should consider the risk of that action being construed as discriminatory.
Oregon鈥檚 statutory protections for injured workers and the obligations imposed on employers can be challenging to navigate. Between reinstatement and reemployment rights, the potential for alleged discrimination, and potential obligations under state or federal disability law, there is a lot for employers to consider when a worker is injured on the job.
Watch for details about a Barran Liebman webinar, 鈥淥verseeing Injured or Disabled Employees: Response, Requirements & Resources for Employers,鈥 that will be presented July 18. Visit www.barran.com to learn more.
Bruce Garrett is an attorney with Barran Liebman LLP. He advises and represents employers on a wide range of issues. Contact him at 503-276-2175 or [email protected].
Becky Zuschlag is a law clerk with Barran Liebman LLP. She partners with attorneys in employment, labor relations and benefits practices. Contact her at 503-276-2151 or聽[email protected].
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed in the preceding commentary are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the Daily Journal of Commerce or its editors. Neither author nor the 91视频 guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information published herein.