Oregon Court of Appeals: Close doesn’t cut it
In our November 2010 column for the 91ÊÓÆµ we wrote about the agonizing 15-year odyssey endured by the city of Woodburn to amend its urban growth boundary (UGB) to […]
Another win for Oregon regional problem-solving process
Many people in the Portland-metro area (particularly during elections) like to throw stones at Metro and bridle regional planning efforts. Given that undercurrent of resentment here, it is interesting to note that Jackson County, and most of its cities, last year completed a 13-year journey to embrace regional government land use planning.
Exactions now include impact fees, but what else?
In Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, the U.S. Supreme Court held that monetary exactions, like requirements to dedicate real property, are subject to the nexus and […]
The importance of ‘raise it or waive it’
The 2013 Oregon Legislature had before it a proposal to apply “raise it or waive it” to legislative matters, plan amendments or land use ordinance revisions. The Legislature rejected […]
The trouble with inadequate findings
Although not identified within the statutorily-prescribed scope of review of Oregon’s Land Use Board of Appeals, all decisions approving proposed development against particular criteria must include adequate findings. As […]
Legislature modifies Oregon land use program
While much of the attention on land use legislation in the 2013 Legislature focused upon wineries, employment lands in Hillsboro and budgets, significant changes also were made to the […]
U.S. Supreme Court expands its take on Takings Clause
In a 5-4 decision last month, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a local government must make “rough proportionality” findings whether it approves or denies a development in […]
Court decision paves way for greater federal involvement in land use
On May 20, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision affirming a sweeping declaratory ruling by the Federal Communications Commission that established a “shot clock” (or time […]
Oregon planning program approaching 40
The current Oregon land use program is nearly 40 years old. The fact that the program has survived is important. The programs of other states have not fared as well.
U.S. Supreme Court affirms EPA’s interpretation of Clean Water Act
Attorneys Ed Sullivan and Carrie Richter analyze the Supreme Courts' recent ruling in Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, a decision that could indicate a change is on the horizon when it comes to agency interpretations the Clean Water Act.
A Portland puzzle: residential parking and transit
In this month's Oregon Land Use column, attorneys Edward Sullivan and Carrie Richter take a close look at the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals' decision that brought to a halt construction on a multifamily project on Southeast 37th Avenue and Division Street.
U.S. Supreme Court finds corps could be liable for government-induced flooding
In November, we noted a pending U.S. Supreme Court case, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, which involved continual but temporary flooding of the Dave Donaldson Black River […]
News
- $960,000 office renovation in Portland building permits | Aug. 10, 2026
- Two projects in historic districts in Portland land use review intakes | Aug. 10, 2026
- Multnomah County commits up to $101.6M for Moda Center
- Portland code changes to take effect in November
- Los Colibris project approved for Portland’s OMSI District
- Pacific Northwest projects totaling $9.9 million in top bidders | Aug. 7, 2026
- Oregon opens infrastructure grant program
- Ex-TV host claps back at Detroit officials in blight case
- 31-unit multifamily project in Portland land use review intakes | Aug. 3, 2026
- $2.4 million office renovation in Portland building permits | Aug. 3, 2026
- Transportation commission weighs ODOT budget cuts
- Lam Research planning $1.7 billion investment in Tualatin
Commentary
- Beware of when the debt collector comes calling | Opinion
- Assembly of a future workforce begins with an invitation | Opinion
- Beware of overlooking legal requirements for remote workers | Opinion
- Become a critical thinker and transform a workplace | Opinion
- Managing construction risks with international suppliers | Opinion
- A rally with many engines: the lesson of 2026’s first half | Opinion
- Oregon housing challenges persist despite sound and fury | Opinion
- When does an employee’s bullying become harassment? | Opinion
- Ditch disorganization — the cost of deferred decisions | Opinion
- Consider 10 common risks for healthcare construction projects | Opinion
- Clarifying the reach of a law regarding prevailing wage | Opinion
- Adjust to legal changes now to ensure compliance later | Opinion







